eISSN: 2619-0087 DOI: 10.31084/2619-0087

Intermetallics Cu — Sn, Cu — Zn — Ni, Cu — Sn — Ti in ignegic rocks of the Shatak complex

Year: 2022

Pages: 3-15

UDC: 553.9+553.21

Number: 3

Type: scientific article

BBK: 63.4 (235.55)

Summary:

In the study of igneous rocks of the Shatak complex, previously not noted, atypical minerals were found, represented by natural bronze, nickel-plated α-brass, iron disilicide and intermetallic compounds of the Cu — Sn — Ti system. As a result of the research, it was found that the genesis of native bronze is satisfactorily described by the evolution of the melt in the Cu — Sn binary system. At the same time, the process of intermetallic formation in the natural environment is divided into two stages: magmatic and metamorphogenic. Cu — Sn — Ti intermetallic compounds were formed in the temperature range >1005–798°C, the lower limit of which is characterized by the coexistence of tin bronze (Cu — Sn) and Cu — Sn — Ti intermetallic compounds. A model for the formation of complex Cu — Sn + Cu — Sn — Ti + Cu2S precipitates is proposed, which is as follows: segregation separation of a homogeneous melt of complex (Cu — Sn — S — Fe — Ti) composition at a temperature above 1000°C; — diffusion redistribution of melt components with accumulation of elements incoherent for the Cu — Sn system in the marginal parts of segregations; — concentration gradient leads to joint crystallization of Cu — Sn + Cu — Sn — Ti intermetallic compounds and “secondary”» segregation of sulfide melt (Cu2S), both in the form of separate drops and in the form of a “shell”, which turns into chalcocite during subsequent metamorphism. It has been established that the temperature conditions for the formation of iron disilicide are described by the Fe — Si diagram, from the analysis of which it follows that at 1220°C a high-temperature modification of FeSi2 is formed, which at 982°C forms a low-temperature modification of iron disilicide by a peritectoid reaction at a constant silicon content. It is concluded that the genesis of intermetallic compounds in the igneous rocks of the Shatak complex is a multi-stage process and is due to the evolutionary development of the magmatic system as a whole.

Keywords:

Southern Urals, Shatak complex, natural bronze, nickel-plated α-brass, iron disilicide, Cu — Sn — Ti system intermetallics

References:

  • Kovalev S.Γ., Vysotsky I.V. (2006). Novyi tip blagorodnometal’noi mineralizatsii v terrigennykh porodakh Shatakskogo grabena (zapadnyi sklon Yuzhnogo Urala) [A new type of precious metal mineralization in terrigenousrocks of the Shatak graben (western slope of the Southern Urals)] // Litologiya i poleznye iskopaemye. №4. 415–421. (In Russian).
  • Kovalev S.Γ., Vysotsky I.V., Kovalev S.S. (2018). Izotopno-geokhimicheskoe (Rb — Sr, Sm — Nd) izuchenie magmaticheskikh porod Shatakskogo kompleksa Bashkirskii megantiklinorii [Isotope-geochemical (Rb — Sr, Sm — Nd) study of igneous rocks of the Shatak complex Bashkir meganticlinorium] // Mat-ly XII mezhreg. nauch.‑pr. konf.: Geologiya, poleznye iskopaemye i problemy geoekologii Bashkortostana, Urala i sopredel’nykh territorii. Ufa: IG UFITs RAN, 256–262. (In Russian).
  • Levitskiy V., Solodilova V., Zavadich N., Pavlova L., Levitskiy I. (2018). Geneticheskaya priroda mineralizatsii s samorodnymi i intermetallicheskimi soedineniyami v Bobruiskoi kol’tsevoi strukture (Respublika Belarus’) [Genetic nature of mineralization on native and intermetalic compounds in the Bobruisk ring structure (Republic of Belarus)] // DAN, 481 (2), 174–178. Doi: 10.31857 / S086956520001198–0 (In Russian).
  • Lyakishev N.P. (1997). Diagrammy sostoyaniya dvoinykh metallicheskikh sistem: Spravochnik: V 3 t. [Diagrams of the state of binary metal systems: Handbook: In z t.]. M: Mashinostroenie. Т. 2. 1024 p. (In Russian).
  • Mokhov A.V., Kartashov P.M., Bogatikov O.A., Magazina L.O., Ashikhmina N.A., Koporulina E.V. (2008). Nakhodka neobychnykh slozhnykh oksidov i ɳ-bronzy v lunnom regolite [Finding unusual complex oxides and ɳ-bronze in the lunar regolith] // Dokl., 421 () 3, 387–390. (In Russian).
  • Nazarov M.A., Demidova S.I., Anosova M.O., Kostitsyn Yu.A., Ntaflos T., Brandstetter F. (2012). Samorodnyi kremnii i silitsidy zheleza v lunnom meteorite DHOFAR 280 [Native silicon and iron silicides in the lunar meteorite DHOFAR 280] // Petrology, 20 (6), 560–573. (In Russian).
  • Novgorodova M.I. (1983). Samorodnye metally v gidrotermal’nykh rudakh [Native metals in hydrothermal ores]. M: Science. 288 p. (In Russian).
  • Novoselova L.N., Bagdasarov E.A. (1979). Novye dannye o silitsidakh zheleza [New data on iron silicides] // Notes of the All-Union Mineralogical Society, 108, 326–333. (In Russian).
  • Puchkov V.N. (2010). Geologiya Urala i Priural’ya (aktual’nye voprosy stratigrafii, tektoniki, geodinamiki i metallogenii) [Geology of the Urals and Cis-Urals (topical issues of stratigraphy, tectonics, geodynamics and metallogeny)]. Ufa: DesignPolygraphService, 280 p. (In Russian).
  • Safronov P.P. (2018). Rudnaya mineralizatsiya v grafitsoderzhashchikh porodakh Khankaiskogo massiva Primor’ya po dannym rastrovoi elektronnoi mikroskopii [Ore mineralization in graphite-bearing rocks of the Khanka massif of Primorye according to scanning electron microscopy] // Bulletin of the Kola Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 4 (10), 78–96. Doi: 10.25702 / KSC. 2307–5228.2018.10.4.78–96 (In Russian).
  • Bai W., Shi N., Fang Q., Li Γ., Yang J., Xiong M., Rong H. Luobusaite — a new mineral // Acta Geologica Sinica. 2007. Vol. 80, №10. P. 1487–1490. Doi: 10.1111/j.1755–6724.2006.tb00289. ξ
  • Kepezhinskas P.K., Kepezhinskas N.P., Berdnikov N.V., Krutikova V.O. Native metals and intermetallic compounds in subduction-related ultramafic rocks from the Stanovoy mobile belt (Russian Far East): Implications for redox heterogeneity in subduction zones // Ore Geology Reviews. 2020. Vol. 127. 103800. P. 1–18. Doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2020.103800
  • Kranidiotis P., MacLean W.H. Systematic of Chlorite Alteration at the Phelps Dodge Massive Sulfide Deposit, Matagami, Quebec // Economic Geology. 1987. Vol. 82, №7. P. 1898–1911. Doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.82.7.1898
  • Lebrun N., Perrot P. Non-Ferrous Metal Systems. Part 3. Cu — Ni — Zn (Copper — Nickel — Zinc) // SpringerVerlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2007. https://materials.springer.com/lb/docs/sm_lbs_978‑3‑540‑47004‑5_30
  • Lepage L.Δ. ILMAT: an excel worksheet for ilmenite-magnetite geothermometry and geobarometry // Comput. Geosci. 2003. Vol. 29, №5. P. 673–678. Doi: 10.1016/s0098–3004(03)00042–6
  • Li Γ., Bai W., Shi N., Fang Q., Xiong M., Yang J., Ma Z., Rong H. Linzhiite, FeSi2, a redefined and revalidated new mineral species from Luobusha, Tibet, China // European Journal of Mineralogy. 2012. Vol. 24, №6. P. 1047–1052. Doi: 10.1127/0935–1221/2012/0024–2237
  • Liu J.J., Yang,L.Β., Dai H.Z., Yuan F., ZhuΒ.Y. Discovery and significance of Cu — Zn intermetallic compounds in the Jingxi gold deposit, western Tianshan Mountains, NW China // Geological Journal. 2014. Vol. 49, №6. P. 584–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj. 2583
  • Manu K., Jezierski J., Ganesh M.R.S., Shankar K.V., Narayanan S.A. Titanium in Cast Cu — Sn Alloys // A Review Materials. 2021. Vol. 14. 4587. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164587
  • Rappenglück M.A. Natural Iron Silicides: A Systematic Review // Minerals. 2022. Vol. 12, №2. P. 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12020188
  • Wang J., Liu C., Leinenbach C., Klotz U. E., Uggowitzer P.J., Löffler J.F. Experimental investigation and thermodynamic assessment of the Cu — Sn — Ti ternary system // Calphad. Comput. Coupling Phase Diagr. Thermochem. 2011. Vol. 35, №1. P. 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2010.12.006
  • Xie Y., Hou Z., Xu J., Yuan Z., Bai Γ., Li Ξ. Discovery of Cu — Zn, Cu — Sn intermetallic minerals and its significance for genesis of the Mianning-Dechang REE Metallogenic Belt, Sichuan Province, China // Science in China, Series Δ (Earth Sciences). 2006. Vol. 49, №6. P. 597–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430‑006‑0597‑9
Download pdf
up
eISSN: 2619-0087 DOI: 10.31084/2619-0087